Syed Saadat |From
DAWN.COM
A commonality between a career in movies and a career in politics in
the Indian subcontinent is the fact that scions of the stars of
yesteryear get a break in the respective arena a lot easily as compared
to any new comer. However, for the general public there is a downside to
this phenomenon prevailing in politics.
Nepotism leading to mediocrity in cinema is not very disturbing
unless one happens to be Francis Ford Cupola, whereas mediocrity in
politics is alarming because politics pervades everything from our
foreign policy to food security. This nepotism is indeed a disguised
form of monarchy, a ‘democratic monarchy’ that is, how ironic! I do not
want to unreasonably eulogise our eastern neighbours but somehow they
manage to do the same thing that we do but with much more maturity and
by being a lot less pompous, be it something as fanciful as movies or as
real as land reforms, devolution or even ‘democratic monarchy’.
Recently our Bilawal, the Bhutto of Zardari clan was in US with his
dad and demanded an apology from Obama on the Salala killings. To be
honest and harsh, if Obama has to lend his ear to a youngster then it
would perhaps be Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook than Mr. Bhutto
because what Zuckerberg has achieved is a result of his own talents. I
do not doubt the young Bhutto’s talent but telling stories about how an
elite archer from his family hit the bull’s eye does not make him an
elite archer but only a storyteller. The charismatic Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto
drew first blood in the 1970s with his sword (the election symbol of
PPP was the sword at that time) and later it was his daughter, Benazir
Bhutto who hit the bull’s eye with an arrow from her bow despite blatant
victimisation by the Zia regime. Sadly Bilawal Bhutto, the Chairperson
of arguably the largest political party of Pakistan has so far come up
with nothing more than ‘Musharraf killed my mother’ and ‘Democracy is
the best revenge’ rant.
Now, let us take a look at how the leadership of our eastern
neighbor, India has done. When then Prime Minister of India, Rajiv
Gandhi was assassinated in 1991, his son Rahul was 21, a little older
than what Bilawal was at the time of Benazir Bhutto’s assassination
still he was not made the chairman of Congress, he did not even consider
the option and continued his higher education unfettered. It was not
until 2004 that Rahul Gandhi announced his entry into politics. Later in
general elections the same year, he won the Lok Sabha seat from Amethi,
his father’s former constituency. Amazingly, it was not until 2006 that
Rahul Gandhi who is the current general secretary of Congress held any
office in Indian National Congress.
In the 2009 General elections, Congress did very well in politically
important Utter Pradesh (UP) and Rahul Gandhi’s extensive and tireless
campaigning was credited for this revival. Still Rahul did not assume
the office of Prime Minister of India despite suggestion from within the
party, instead Manmohan Singh got the final nod. Rahul reiterated at
this point that he wanted to consolidate Congress, shun divisive
politics in India, mobilise youth and was needed more on that front.
Though Congress did not do well in the 2012 Assembly elections, the
decline in popularity being attributed to the economic policies of the
central government, still Rahul did his part in campaigning in Uttar
Pradesh, he apparently attended more than 200 rallies, slept in
villagers’ huts and even grew a beard to counterbalance the ultra
sophisticated image his debonair looks give and to look like more of a
man of the people. Rahul Gandhi despite having the opportunity of
sitting on his heels and enjoying the highest office in the largest
democracy of the world, has made it a point to connect with the people
of India; he has been there and seen it all.
He has tasted success and suffered setbacks. This is how statesmen
are made. He is not the only example of somebody in the younger
generation of Indian politics who has come of age, Akhilash Yadev, the
man behind the success of Samajwadi Party (SP) in the Utter Pradesh
state assembly elections this year is another example. Akhilash Yadev is
the son of Mulayam Singh Yadev, President of the Samajwadi Party and
won his seat in UP state assembly elections for the first time in 2000
and after the state assembly elections of 2012, has now become the
youngest Chief Minister of Utter Pradesh at the age of 38. Akhilesh
instead of towing the old line re-invented his father’s party by
conducting cycle rallies, using modern technology and opening up the
party, hitherto accused of harbouring goondas (hooligans), to new ideas,
means and ideology. The result was SP winning 224 seats in the UP
assembly elections of 2012 as opposed to a mere 97 in 2007.
On the contrary, our political parties have young Bhuttos, Sharifs,
Khosas, Chaudhrys and Khars presenting themselves as kings in waiting
rather than servants of the people. They are mere storytellers, too
afraid to be part of the story; and history has no place for
storytellers. It mentions kings and even pawns if they are brave enough,
but not the storytellers.
It is said only shrubs grow under oak trees, however, if one desires
the grandeur of an oak then it would be sage to leave its shadow. The
question is do our young politicians have the guts? Divulging the answer
would be stating the obvious.
No comments:
Post a Comment